Jon's Page

Post-Naksa Regime Debate and Political Change If ' Amer's group had posed the major obstacle to the YO's growth before the war, postwar opposition came from various state actors who feared its potential power and the youth's radical activism. The demonstrations of June 9-10, 1967, and February 1968,a form of power regime authorities had not had to deal with since 1954, had afforded youth a poignant lesson in street politics. Most unsettling was the radical language adopted by YO leaders. Demands… Continue

Leftists were deeply disillusioned. Lutfi al-Kholi, who had ardently backed the March 30 program in al-Tali'a editorials, felt he and his colleagues' efforts had been rewarded by a conscious, behind-the-scenes effort "to make war on the Marxists during the elections." Nasser, described as appearing genuinely upset by the CC election outcome, stated that the time was not right to pick a domestic fight, given the need to rebuild the military. He told the dejected al-Tali'a staff: "I know what they… Continue

Nasser was both frightened and fascinated by the worker-student demonstrations -- so much so that he requested analyses of the demonstrators' slogans. He wondered whether they heralded the dawning of a new, regime-challenging political awareness. And he reshuffled the government, bringing in more civilians and "liberal-leaning" elements like Hilmi Murad, Tharwat 'Ukasha, and others. expository essay we draft are custom, satisfact… Continue

The February demonstrations have often been characterized as pro-liberal democratic, but this view is misleading. Demonstrators were, in deed, calling for more democracy, but most did so from a Leftist-Marxist perspective. Their demand was for more democratic practice (elections, an end to the police state) in a democratic centralist framework. As the main student demonstration wound its way from Cairo University to the Maglis al-Umma -- an army of 40,000 to 50,000 demonstrators stretched out al… Continue